Climate Change – Part 3

If it was not so serious, the vote taken by the U.S. Senate to affirm that humans are not the cause of climate change would be a joke. The rejection by an entire political party of scientific data is so inane that it defies any attempt to explain the underlying rationale.

Having been involved in the political arena I can understand disagreeing on solutions to problems. I can even respect that there are differing ideologies. What I cannot abide by is sheer banality.

As related to prior blog posts that reference simple physics, I say clearly that it is time for our elected officials to get their heads out of the sand. Grow up and act like adults, not petulant children and act decisively on energy.

The Senate on Thursday again voted to reject two measures related to the Keystone XL pipeline that declared that humans are a cause of climate change — the second set of votes on the issue in two days.

Senators are using the Keystone debate to argue over climate issues. The Democrats want to force their Republican colleagues to come out one way or another on whether they believe humans have a role in changes to the climate and the rise of global temperatures. Republicans telegraphed their intent to attack President Obama’s climate policy agenda.

Mr. Obama is expected to veto the underlying bill that would force federal approval of the Keystone pipeline and allow construction to begin. Still, the debate has led to the first Senate floor votes in eight years on climate change measures.

earth-fossil-fuelsOn Thursday, the Senate voted 56 to 42 not to take up an amendment offered by Senator Bernard Sanders, independent of Vermont, that declared that climate change is real, is caused by humans and wreaks devastation. The amendment also called on the federal government to lead the way in the national transition away from dependence on fossil fuels.

Senators voted 54 to 46 not to take up an amendment offered by Senator Joe Manchin III, Democrat of West Virginia, that also declared human-caused climate change to be real and devastating, and urged the government to support research on technologies that would capture carbon emissions from fossil fuels.

A third, Republican-sponsored amendment, which was rejected 51 to 46, was more political in nature. Offered by Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri, it called on the Senate to nullify a climate change agreement in November between the United States and China in which both nations pledged to reduce their carbon emissions.

Read the full article:
Senate Rejects Human Role in Climate Change
Limited free access; NY Times subscription may be required.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *